Monday, May 3, 2010

What We Do to Them - 2

How we are failing children in our education systems.

Part 1 - Some basic facts:

1. Children learn better in a reward based system. Those rewards do not always have to be praise or presents as such. Reward = “They see something in it for themselves and can get it.” One such reward – they actually enjoy what they are doing!

2. Children learn better contextually. E.g. Teach them Pythagoras’s theorem with diagrams on a blackboard, some will get it. SHOW them how it is used, e.g. in calculating the height of a mountain top, most will get it. That is “Get it”, not just “Memorise it”.

3. This is the twenty first century, with computers and the Internet.
“What is the Capital of India?”
Old way - err, I’ll try to remember.
New way “Let’s check with Encarta or Google.” - on my cell phone!
Trying to store away a mass of facts is both useless and redundant:
• There are far too many for any human to gather in a complete lifetime
• Most are up there on the Internet.
We do not need to teach how to memorise, we need to teach how to search, understand and extrapolate. Using something in a practical way actually tends to plonk the ‘facts’ into memory with far less effort.

4. Yes, there are some basic skills we need to teach – yet these are the very ones that are becoming weakest in children now. Communication, social interaction, initiative, TEAM WORK!

5. Teaching in a categorised way prevents cross-fertilisation of ideas.
E.g. This lesson is Chemistry, or Physics, or History. It is in total contrast to our world, which is rarely so neatly categorised.
Most of the greatest advances today are coming from combinations of very differing fields. E.g. Computer graphics concepts are being used in cancer research and have sparked an amazing new approach and understanding.

6. We haveTIME, but we introduce specialisation far too early! This is the result of mixing two concepts:
• So much to memorise!
• If you haven’t made it by 30,20, 15?, you are a failure.
We misuse time, choosing to abuse it and create needless pressure/stress. “Only two months until the exams, get to work!”

7. Exam based learning is USELESS!
Oh, it provides stats for Education Ministries, helps rank schools in competition with each other, makes ’A’ student’s parents feel proud, and gives us some superstars to praise and write about in the newspapers.

They’re a great KPIs (Key Point Indicators) for the supposed success or failure of the latest implementation of an education policy. Note the word I used – “Supposed”.
And – hey – we get results every year, that’s almost instant gratification.

Truth is, each new set of exams supersedes the previous, effectively negating them.
e.g. In my school days: Eleven plus passed? Forget that, you must get O’Levels. Forget them, it’s A’Levels. Forget them, it’s a degree that counts.
Then, at the job interview, “What experience do you have?”

We use these stages for one simple reason – few of us actually learned how to assess someone. Look at the plethora of “Personality Test”, “Interview Techniques”, “Personal Assessment”, etc tools being sold. All with check boxes and computer calculated results.
As someone who has had to interview and recruit literally many hundreds of people over the last three decades, and had to work with people selected by others using these “techniques”, I can’t emphasize enough how crap these systems are.

8. Children, despite the strength of the Myth, do not develop at the same rate or in the same way. Yet schools generally lump them all together based on age bands. So one six year old is bored to tears amongst the others, while one eight year old struggles to keep up with the others.



Although, in many countries, there are pockets of people that understand these facts - I know of only one country as a whole that is applying them and changing the way they deal with education.
Singapore.
Unlike most of the other “Let’s make changes” we’ve seen over the decades, they also understand the need to phase in their approach – with a carefully worked out transition plan.

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Then again, there are disciplines in which memorising precise details is fundamentally important. If we don't teach children how to memorise in school, how will anyone be able to store the incredible amount of data needed in law and the sciences?

    As a doctor you can't be performing an operation and then stop halfway through to Google the internal organs you'll be removing. Likewise a lawyer can't stop halfway through a case and say, "Sorry, M'lud, I didn't Ask Jeeves about that clause beforehand."

    There's a reason we are taught to store this information, because most occupations require fast decisions and informed thinking. Encouraging children to treat the internet as the storage part of their brain is dangerous, so this opinion is clearly unhinged.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Claire:
    "Unhinged" - I love it.

    A few things in reply:

    a. Did you see where I said "Children"? Potential lawyers (surgeons) do NOT learn all that Law (surgery techniques) at school. Maybe I should have defined children as "younger than Graduate level".
    In case you didn't know - most lawyers have forgotten all that stuff. They have this wonderful device called "Articled clerks" who do it for them. Those articled clerks are a stage in the "becoming a lawyer" system.
    Most surgeons don't learn their stuff until after they have qualidied in medicine. They, and I know this for a fact, do not rely on what they learned dissecting frogs in school.

    b. Did you see where I said "We have TIME" and "We introduce specialisation too soon"?
    I'm glad you chose those two areas where having lived a bit first would do wonders!

    c. I love that "fast decissions". Do you truly believe our schooling systems help with that - I certainly have seen ample evidence that it does not.

    d. It is a joke to think that schools teach how to memorise. They teach how to remember enough to pass exams. Most ex-schoolers still have crap memories. In some ways, school was a form of aversion therapy when it comes to memory.
    Read what I said about "pops into memory" and "cross-fertilisation."

    e. You have illustrated one of my points. I assume you read all of this blog, but you didn't put the pieces together - because I did not (deliberately) spell it all out.

    In this post, I am giving the facts current education ignores on the whole, in my next post I will give the improved methods - which will cover how to learn those essentials (memory and la de da).

    ReplyDelete